Blog For Free!
Archives
Home
2008 April
2008 January
2007 June
2007 February
2006 September
2006 May
2005 December
2005 August
2005 July
2005 June
My Links
Cato Institute
Foundation for Economic Education
International Society for Individual Liberty
Independent Institute
Heartland Institute
Institute for Liberal Values
Institute for Economic Affairs
Tom Palmer Blog
Rational Review
Reason Magazine
Wendy McElroy
Future of Freedom Foundation
Freedom Summit
Dynamist (Virginia Postrel)
Free Speech Coalition
tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images
Sponsored
Blog
|
| Racist, bigots and others, oh my. |
| 08.08.05 (10:27 pm) [edit] |
Another vermin from the Rockwellian crowd has been exposed. It seems they have an almost endless supply of them. This time the culprit is Bob Wallace. Tom Palmer, who is one of the most hated opponents of the racists, confederates and sundry lunatics, who have infested the the Mises Institute and LewRockwell.com exposed Wallace. It seems Wallace was a bit too open with his racism. He published some comments at Strike-the-Root.
http://www.strike-the-root.com/cgi-local/yabb/YaBB.pl?board=" title="http://www.strike-the-root.com/cgi-local/yabb/YaBB.pl?board=" target="_blank"http://www.strike-the-root.co...;action=usersrecentposts; username=Bob_Wallace
Wallace said “Blacks are genetically inferior, always have been, always will be. Except for music and sports, they will always be on the bottom...” Of course Wallace can’t hold a candle to Thomas Sowell but I’ve always thought that racism was more likely the refuge of those who feel inferior—and often with good justification.
Wallace also was openly antiJewish like some of his fellow contributors to the Rockwell web site. He says that, “Jews will always be ostracized because of their attempts to destroy every culture that admits them.” Please note that this clearly says that Jews are responsible for antiSemitism because Jews as a group try to “destroy every culture that admits them”. One must wonder what the Jew Ludwig von Mises, whose names is besmirched by Rockwell’s Mises Institute, would have thought of such remarks.
Wallace tried to turn the tables on Palmer by attacking him, calling him names and engaging in antigay rhetoric to go along with his racism and anti-semitism. Wallace says that Palmer is a “PC believer in Thoughtcrime. Like other libertine psuedo-libertarians, he is actually a leftist.” http://home.att.net/~bob.wallace/hatemail.html I have notice that racists of various ilks have always tried to jump on the anti-PC bandwagon as a way of justifying their bigotry. They seem to think that because the Left went to one extreme it justifies them going to the other extreme.
So now they aren’t bigots. They are just anti-PC. Bullshit. They are bigots. They are racists, they are lowlife scum. They can call it being anti-PC, they can call it anything they like. A bigot is still a bigot even if he doesn’t like political correctness. Being anti PC is not the same thing as being pro racism or any of the other base prejudices indulged by the lunatic fringe even when that lunatic fringe is within our own movement.
Why is Palmer a “leftist”? The proof is that Palmer “despises LewRockwell.com and other libertarian sites”. Now the bigot judges the individual by his membership in a group. To the Nazi the individual Jew is bad because the Nazi believe Jews, as a group, are up to something evil—perhaps he says they are trying to “destroy ever culture that admits them”. To the racist the individual Black man is bad because blacks as a group are racially inferior. This type of methodological collectivism is rampant in Wallace’s racist and bigoted remarks. And he uses the same sort of collectivist hate-mongering against Palmer.
According to this cretin “Palmer’s problem is that he is homosexual”. Ah, see, the individual Palmer is bad because he belongs to a class of people which the bigoted Wallace hates. Wallace thinks Jews are culture destroyers and blacks are inferior to whites and he thinks homosexuality is a “disease-ridden lifestyle.” This supposedly wry observation by Wallace causes him to quip again: “As you can see, I am not PC at all.” No. Neither was Hitler or David Duke. According to the anti-black, anti-Jewish, antigay contributor to Rockwell’s web site gays “are responsible for one-third of all child sex crimes, and two thirds of all AIDS cases. They are responsible for 100% of all pederasty.” I wonder what the house gays at Rockwell have to say about that.
Wallace says Palmer “is clearly narcissistic” but this is also because he’s gay. He claims Palmer is “vicious” and “hateful”. All I can think of here is the old childhood saying of “It takes one to know one.” The man attacks blacks, Jews, homosexuals, Asians, Hispanics, etc. and then has the audacity to call people upset by his bigotry “hateful” and “vicious”.
What is funny is reading the sad postings of Wallace. He spends most of his time calling people who disagree with him by stupid names or by inventing links to their email addresses. So when someone disagrees with them he refers to them as “My IQ is 85” and if you click on that phrase you get the email address of the person he is attacking. He basically argues that those who do not like his rants are stupid or “mental cases”. He refers to them with contempt by calling them “12-year old’s” or as a “13 Years Old” and the like. To one critic he responded: “my IQ is 135 and I guarantee yours isn’t.” And this man has the balls to say Palmer is narcissistic! He doesn’t seem to notice that later he says: “My experience with stupid people is that they think they're smart.” So stupid people actually think they are smart. They may even brag about it!
Wallace, who prides himself on being an intellectual, rarely shows his intellect and resorts to insults over and over. One opponent of his is called “a pussy”. Wallace says: “My sister wouldn’t date him. I can’t imagine any woman that would. Maybe Tom Palmer would. Maybe not, though. Even a poofter probably has higher standards that the ugliness that is Roy.” When a woman disagrees with him she is described as “Need to Get Laid but Bad” by the supposedly brainy Wallace. Another person is referred to a “reallytinylittledi ck”. But when one opponent says Wallace is being “stupid” the Rockwellian ridicules this and says: “Oooh, now we’re in jr. high.” What chutzpah! The man ridicules people, calls them mental cases, stupid, ugly, attacks them for being gay or in desperate need of being laid and then whines and implies someone else is acting like a junior high school student for saying he’s stupid.
Shortly after this he exhibits his own higher standards by referring to someone as “Jerkin’ My Gerkin”. I’m glad he’s mature and has an IQ of 135 but one would be hard pressed to find enough evidence to prove it. For someone who keeps telling people how intelligent he is he doesn’t seem to realize that the word is gherkin not gerkin.
The Rockwellian memory hole went into effect after the expose. Rockwell’s site had listed Wallace as a contributor but when Palmer exposed the man’s open bigotry he was delisted as if his numerous contributions didn’t exist. Yet he contributed a bit short of 200 essays to Rockwell’s site. His name was removed from the list of contributors here. http://www.lewrockwell.com/co... Yet it is archived here: http://web.archive.org/web/20... Rockwell gives no explanation as to why another major contributor to his site has disappeared.
In other news one of the fringes of the fringes of the warmongering Objectivist movement is in an uproar. A group run by a New Zealander called SOLO, which is barely known in the libertarian/Objectivist word and of little significance, is having problems. The SOLO founder has a tendency to launch into rabid attacks and smears against those he perceives as enemies and his enemies seem to include anyone who doesn’t regularly tell him how wonderful he is.
Well one of his former acolytes has posted a message at the SOLO forum saying: “There is a large drooling beast in the middle of the room at SOLO, and everyone is trying to talk around him without mentioning him by name. The name of this beast is alcoholism. Lindsay Perigo, you are an alcoholic.”
A few of the true believers have denied this accusation but many others in New Zealand dismiss those denials. One of those who denied the problem, according to one source we checked, has himself had some embarrassing problems due to over indulgence in alcohol himself. He supposedly got so blotto on one specific occasion that he exposed himself to a room full of college students and started masturbating. He presents his testimony in defense of the accused. A couple of individuals best described as “drinking buddies” of the accused deny he drinks too much. They argue that it can’t be true because they drink more than he does. I’m not sure how that exonerates anyone.
The SOLOists are small band of Objectivists who are as narcissistic as most Objectivists--if not more so. The whole purpose of the group was to set Objectivism right. All other Objectivists are wrong and the groups founder seems to think he channels Ayn Rand. Actually he probably thinks he’s improved on Rand with his own interpretations. He’s rabidly pro-war of course. And anyone who thinks that war is an excuse for the expansion of state power he dismisses as “Saddamites”. That’s hardly an intellectual argument at all.
Rightwatch thanks those who tipped us off to these articles. If you have information on the lunatic fringe of authoritarian libertarians please pass it on. We will look into it and report it to all if warranted and supported by the evidence.
|
|
|
| |
| Racist, bigots and others, oh my. |
| 08.08.05 (10:22 pm) [edit] |
Another vermin from the Rockwellian crowd has been exposed. It seems they have an almost endless supply of them. This time the culprit is Bob Wallace. Tom Palmer, who is one of the most hated opponents of the racists, confederates and sundry lunatics, who have infested the the Mises Institute and LewRockwell.com exposed Wallace. It seems Wallace was a bit too open with his racism. He published some comments at Strike-the-Root.
http://www.strike-the-root.com/cgi-local/yabb/YaBB.pl?board=" title="http://www.strike-the-root.com/cgi-local/yabb/YaBB.pl?board=" target="_blank"http://www.strike-the-root.co...;action=usersrecentposts; username=Bob_Wallace
Wallace said “Blacks are genetically inferior, always have been, always will be. Except for music and sports, they will always be on the bottom...” Of course Wallace can’t hold a candle to Thomas Sowell but I’ve always thought that racism was more likely the refuge of those who feel inferior—and often with good justification.
Wallace also was openly antiJewish like some of his fellow contributors to the Rockwell web site. He says that, “Jews will always be ostracized because of their attempts to destroy every culture that admits them.” Please note that this clearly says that Jews are responsible for antiSemitism because Jews as a group try to “destroy every culture that admits them”. One must wonder what the Jew Ludwig von Mises, whose names is besmirched by Rockwell’s Mises Institute, would have thought of such remarks.
Wallace tried to turn the tables on Palmer by attacking him, calling him names and engaging in antigay rhetoric to go along with his racism and anti-semitism. Wallace says that Palmer is a “PC believer in Thoughtcrime. Like other libertine psuedo-libertarians, he is actually a leftist.” http://home.att.net/~bob.wallace/hatemail.html I have notice that racists of various ilks have always tried to jump on the anti-PC bandwagon as a way of justifying their bigotry. They seem to think that because the Left went to one extreme it justifies them going to the other extreme.
So now they aren’t bigots. They are just anti-PC. Bullshit. They are bigots. They are racists, they are lowlife scum. They can call it being anti-PC, they can call it anything they like. A bigot is still a bigot even if he doesn’t like political correctness. Being anti PC is not the same thing as being pro racism or any of the other base prejudices indulged by the lunatic fringe even when that lunatic fringe is within our own movement.
Why is Palmer a “leftist”? The proof is that Palmer “despises LewRockwell.com and other libertarian sites”. Now the bigot judges the individual by his membership in a group. To the Nazi the individual Jew is bad because the Nazi believe Jews, as a group, are up to something evil—perhaps he says they are trying to “destroy ever culture that admits them”. To the racist the individual Black man is bad because blacks as a group are racially inferior. This type of methodological collectivism is rampant in Wallace’s racist and bigoted remarks. And he uses the same sort of collectivist hate-mongering against Palmer.
According to this cretin “Palmer’s problem is that he is homosexual”. Ah, see, the individual Palmer is bad because he belongs to a class of people which the bigoted Wallace hates. Wallace thinks Jews are culture destroyers and blacks are inferior to whites and he thinks homosexuality is a “disease-ridden lifestyle.” This supposedly wry observation by Wallace causes him to quip again: “As you can see, I am not PC at all.” No. Neither was Hitler or David Duke. According to the anti-black, anti-Jewish, antigay contributor to Rockwell’s web site gays “are responsible for one-third of all child sex crimes, and two thirds of all AIDS cases. They are responsible for 100% of all pederasty.” I wonder what the house gays at Rockwell have to say about that.
Wallace says Palmer “is clearly narcissistic” but this is also because he’s gay. He claims Palmer is “vicious” and “hateful”. All I can think of here is the old childhood saying of “It takes one to know one.” The man attacks blacks, Jews, homosexuals, Asians, Hispanics, etc. and then has the audacity to call people upset by his bigotry “hateful” and “vicious”.
What is funny is reading the sad postings of Wallace. He spends most of his time calling people who disagree with him by stupid names or by inventing links to their email addresses. So when someone disagrees with them he refers to them as “My IQ is 85” and if you click on that phrase you get the email address of the person he is attacking. He basically argues that those who do not like his rants are stupid or “mental cases”. He refers to them with contempt by calling them “12-year old’s” or as a “13 Years Old” and the like. To one critic he responded: “my IQ is 135 and I guarantee yours isn’t.” And this man has the balls to say Palmer is narcissistic! He doesn’t seem to notice that later he says: “My experience with stupid people is that they think they're smart.” So stupid people actually think they are smart. They may even brag about it!
Wallace, who prides himself on being an intellectual, rarely shows his intellect and resorts to insults over and over. One opponent of his is called “a pussy”. Wallace says: “My sister wouldn’t date him. I can’t imagine any woman that would. Maybe Tom Palmer would. Maybe not, though. Even a poofter probably has higher standards that the ugliness that is Roy.” When a woman disagrees with him she is described as “Need to Get Laid but Bad” by the supposedly brainy Wallace. Another person is referred to a “reallytinylittledi ck”. But when one opponent says Wallace is being “stupid” the Rockwellian ridicules this and says: “Oooh, now we’re in jr. high.” What chutzpah! The man ridicules people, calls them mental cases, stupid, ugly, attacks them for being gay or in desperate need of being laid and then whines and implies someone else is acting like a junior high school student for saying he’s stupid.
Shortly after this he exhibits his own higher standards by referring to someone as “Jerkin’ My Gerkin”. I’m glad he’s mature and has an IQ of 135 but one would be hard pressed to find enough evidence to prove it. For someone who keeps telling people how intelligent he is he doesn’t seem to realize that the word is gherkin not gerkin.
The Rockwellian memory hole went into effect after the expose. Rockwell’s site had listed Wallace as a contributor but when Palmer exposed the man’s open bigotry he was delisted as if his numerous contributions didn’t exist. Yet he contributed a bit short of 200 essays to Rockwell’s site. His name was removed from the list of contributors here. http://www.lewrockwell.com/co... Yet it is archived here: http://web.archive.org/web/20... Rockwell gives no explanation as to why another major contributor to his site has disappeared.
In other news one of the fringes of the fringes of the warmongering Objectivist movement is in an uproar. A group run by a New Zealander called SOLO, which is barely known in the libertarian/Objectivist word and of little significance, is having problems. The SOLO founder has a tendency to launch into rabid attacks and smears against those he perceives as enemies and his enemies seem to include anyone who doesn’t regularly tell him how wonderful he is.
Well one of his former acolytes has posted a message at the SOLO forum saying: “There is a large drooling beast in the middle of the room at SOLO, and everyone is trying to talk around him without mentioning him by name. The name of this beast is alcoholism. Lindsay Perigo, you are an alcoholic.”
A few of the true believers have denied this accusation but many others in New Zealand dismiss those denials. One of those who denied the problem, according to one source we checked, has himself had some embarrassing problems due to over indulgence in alcohol himself. He supposedly got so blotto on one specific occasion that he exposed himself to a room full of college students and started masturbating. He presents his testimony in defense of the accused. A couple of individuals best described as “drinking buddies” of the accused deny he drinks too much. They argue that it can’t be true because they drink more than he does. I’m not sure how that exonerates anyone.
The SOLOists are small band of Objectivists who are as narcissistic as most Objectivists--if not more so. The whole purpose of the group was to set Objectivism right. All other Objectivists are wrong and the groups founder seems to think he channels Ayn Rand. Actually he probably thinks he’s improved on Rand with his own interpretations. He’s rabidly pro-war of course. And anyone who thinks that war is an excuse for the expansion of state power he dismisses as “Saddamites”. That’s hardly an intellectual argument at all.
Rightwatch thanks those who tipped us off to these articles. If you have information on the lunatic fringe of authoritarian libertarians please pass it on. We will look into it and report it to all if warranted and supported by the evidence.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
